## Syllogisms Possibility Tricks with Examples:

Hi friends Syllogisms is one of the easy to win questions in reasoning, but we have seen so many aspirants are finding difficult in solving these questions. Usually Venn diagram method (Easy) is used to solve these but they will consume time in case of NO/Possibility conclusion cases. So here we are explaining the concept of Syllogism with some examples by using some simple rules.
First and foremost have a quick glance at the Main rules to solve Syllogism Problems…
• All+All=All
• All+No=No
• All+Some=No Conclusion

• Some+All=Some
• Some+No= Some Not
• Some+Some= No Conclusion

• No +All = Some Not (Reversed)
• No+Some=Some Not (Reversed)
• No+No=No Conclusion
• Some Not /Some Not Reversed +Anything = No Conclusion

If the conclusion is in “Possibility” case then these rules must be applied.
• If All A are B then we can say - Some B are Not A is a Possibility
• If Some B are Not A then we can say - All A are B is a Possibility
• If Some A are B then we can say - All A are B is a Possibility All B are A is a Possibility
That is
• All <=> Some Not Reversed
• Some => All
• NO Conclusion = Any Possibility is true
When it is implemented (In case of Conclusion from Single Statement)
1. All => Some that means if All A are B then Some B are A is true.
2. Some <=> Some that means if Some A are B then Some B are A is true.
3. No <=> No that means if No A is B then NO B is A is true

### How to use these Syllogism Rules to solve questions?

Inorder to solve Syllogism there are two types:
1. Cross Cancellation
2. Vertical Cancellation
Let us see about Cross Cancellation with example:
Example 1:
Statements:
1. All Cows are Parrots
2. All Parrots are Birds
3. No Bird is Monkey
Conclusions:
1. No Parrot is Monkey
2. Some Cows being Monkey is Possibility
We know you might be able to solve it by using Venn diagram method that's good  but this method won't help or a bit tough when it comes to No or possibility Conclusions

Here is explanation
Lets take 1st conclusion, we have to make relation between Parrot and Monkey so we will take statements 2 and 3.
This is called Cross Cancellation , We have cancelled Bird from Bird so we have left with (ALL+NO) rule, and that leads to No Parrot is Monkey So Conclusion I is TRUE.

In second statement we have Cow and Monkey so we will need to make relation between them. For this we need to take all 3 statements.
Now we have left with ((All+All)+NO) that is No Cow is Monkey . We don’t have any rule to convert this statement into Possibility so second conclusion is FALSE

I think we are clear with above explanation now see about Vertical Cancellation
Example 2:
Statements:
1. Some Mails are Messages
2. All Updates are Messages
Conclusion:
1. All Mails Being Update is a Possibility
2. No Update is Mail

Lets take Conclusion “All Mails Being Update is a Possibility” that means we have to make relation between Mails and Updates

This is called Vertical cancellation. In this case direction of adding first phrase will be reversed i.e In
Above example the conclusion will be All+Some = No Conclusion.

IF we get No Conclusion in case of Possibility then according to Rules in Possibility case will be definitely true. So Conclusion 1 follows and Conclusion 2nd Don’t.

So far we have seen how to deal with All, Some, Some Not and No now let us see about Some Not in reversed condition.

What is Some Not (Reversed)?
To explain this let’s take a Simple example
1. No A is B
2. All B is C

So the conclusion you get for this will be as follows
(No+All) A is C = (Some Not Reversed) A is C
Therefore
Some C are Not A.

Finally my advice is...
Use this only if there are No or Possibility conclusions by following the above rules else you can happily use Venn Diagram method (If you find this method useful though). Don't get more confused for easy topics by doing unnecessary faults.

Lastly feel free to ask us if you have any doubts....
Enjoy Reading

Update:
Hi guys recently I have found one rule and some terms that are asking in tests these days which I intend to share with you guys...

"No" statement can be converted into two types
1. Some Not
2. No (interchanging Subject and Predicate)

Confused???
Let me explain this with an Example
Suppose statement is given as No Professor is Student then this statement can be valid to take as
1. Some Professor are not Student
2. No Student is Professor

cleared now.

Another update is now a days in exams they are mentioning None, Only, Almost etc instead of All, Some in both statements and conclusions so I'm listing the terms here.

All => Every, Each, Any, None, Not a single, Only
Remaining will be treated as follows
Some, Many, a few, Quite a few, Not many, Very little, Most of, Almost, Generally, Often, Frequently, Atleast
Note: As far as I know these terms are very rare for Bank Exams.

Your Mind is itching to know more Concepts, check Other Explanations here:

This content is copyrighted to Dreamjobadda please do not copy this without my permission and also aspirants are requested to inform me if any of you find this material in any other sites. Thank you...
Note:
Having doubt on How to prepare for SBI PO 2016 Reasoning Topics?

Grab Daily Updates by Subscribing here. Enter your email address

Please check your INBOX for Confirmatin Link

#### 381 comments:

1. Thanks alot for sharing the tricks.. its very useful and easy to understand.
If possible kindly share some practice set.

1. You are welcome...
Already posted so many practice sets please Search or see in Tests label.
PM me if you have any doubts
All the very best

2. This comment has been removed by the author.

2. if the conclusion in same not so possibilty me kya lenge

1. If All A are B then we can say - Some B are Not A is a Possibility
If Some B are Not A then we can say - All A are B is a Possibility
If Some A are B then we can say - All A are B is a Possibility All B are A is a Possibility

3. how to solve facing outward and facing center circular arrangement

4. if in vertical cancellation example the order of statement is reversed then we will get a valid conclusion between Mails and Update

1. Sorry Jai I didn't get your doubt clearly, can you please specify

5. sir this is a very useful method.Thanks a lot for sharing the tricks.

1. You are welcome Bikas Das

6. Hello sir,
If in the conclusion list its stated:-
1.some A are either B or C.
And in the statement:-
1. Some A are B.
2. Some B are C.
Then how we can solve this.
Thank u sir.

1. Hi Sekhar,
As you see there is No conclusion for Some+Some combination both in Venn diagram model and these Rules model but there is one condition that must satisfy the following rule
if Statements consists of "Some" and
conclusions consists of Some and No (with same names) then it is possible to say Either Or otherwise you can say it as No Conclusion...

7. can any one explain how to solve syllogism with at least cases..like atlest some apple are mango

1. Hi Laxmi,
Adding Atleast is just to confuse you...
you don't have to consider it
if
"at least some apples are mango" is given
just take
some apples are mango to solve that's it...
if you have any more doubts comment here.
please hit LIKE to support me thank you
Regards,
Harshini

8. Some teachers are professors.
Some lecturers are teachers.

Conclusions:
I. All teachers as well as professors being
lecturers is a possibility.
II. All those teachers who are lecturers are
also professors.
1) if only conclusion I follows.
2) if only conclusion II follows.
3) if either conclusion I or conclusion II follows.
4) if neither conelusion I nor conclusion II follows.
5) if both conclusions I and II follow.

anyone plz tell me the answer and tick to solve

1. Hi,
Here answer is 4...
For these kind of questions you have to draw the venn diagram and try to solve them by meaning(instead of logic) most of the questions like these can be cleared...

2. thnx a lot mam

3. You're welcome

4. but mem u said na.when no conclusion is answer any posibility can b answer...

5. I already mentioned that these are very rare and unique ones, also they have three terms in them so be aware of these kinds of questions and do like that.

6. i think answer should be 1... according to ven diagram coz its possibilities case

9. Hello,
Please clarify, what type of questions can not be solved with this method? I am bit confused where to apply this method and where to apply venn diagram method.

10. Hello,
Please clarify, what type of questions cannot be solved with this method as I am bit confused where to apply this method and where to apply venn diagram method?

1. Hi Lalita,
No need to get confused every method is meant to solve quickly, here you can follow any method but the thing is time consumption... Venn diagram takes a bit more time incase of No and Possibilities comparing to Syllogism Rules I mentioned. If there aren't any NO, Possibilities and you feel Venn model is easy you can use that...
All the Best
Regards
Harshini
Please do hit LIKE and Share if you want to support me...

11. No +All = Some Not (Reversed)
reversed means what?

1. Hi Vinita,
Suppose take
No A is B
All B are C

Now conclusion is
no+all = some not (A is C) this has to be reversed
Therefore you get something like this
some C is not A
you have to change the places of A and C that's it....
Regards,
Harshini

2. You are welcome Vinita
All the best to you

12. No A is B
all B is C
Answer is no A is C.
Pls clarify

1. Hi...
No + All = Some not reversed
so
No C is A

2. Right answer is
Some c is not A

3. Answer is some c is not A
Plz fix if m wrong

4. Hi Jyothi,
You are correct... thanks for correcting me, I mistyped above answer and sorry for confusing you.

13. Madam will you give one example for all of the statement and conclusion according to this method so that we can get easily.

14. Stmt: Some A are B

Plz list all the possibility conclusions for the same

1. Hi Anugrih,
Some A are B
then following conclusions occur in possibilities
All A are B is a Possibility
(or)
All B are A is a Possibility

2. I have doubt in either or and neither or questions.. Could you plz explain with simple examples ..I can understand the rules and finally I would select wrong answers ..plz explain clearly

3. If Statements consists only SOME or other combinations from which answers do not occur
and
in Conclusions where any two conclusions consists of
SOME and NO with same names then it is possible to say EITHER OR here
Finally if those two also have different names then you can say
NEITHER NOR

15. how would we apply vertical cancellation to this kind of question:

all calenders are papers.
some calenders are animals.

conclusion: 1) some papers are animals 2) some animals are papers

according to venn diagram both are true but according to vertical cancellation no conclusion should be the answer as all+some=no conclusion.
should i reverse the phrase here as well? is there any difference in considering the order of phrases when it comes to right vertical cancellation or left vertical cancellation?

1. Hi,
I already mentioned in the above explanation USE these rules only in cases of NO and Possibilities Cases to avoid confusions.
Anyway here in vertical cancellation as mentioned above you have to take
Some + All = Some
so that you will get Some Animals are Papers = 2nd conclusion
and Some can be reversed so that
Some animals are papers = Some papers are animals is true

16. Hi,

I'd like to appreciate the efforts you put in imparting such useful imformation about syllogism. I'm sure a lot of people will benefit from it.

I have a query and i'll be grateful if you could provide the detailed explanation of the technique that you will use in solving it.

Q: All Parrots are Flowers
No Flower is a carrot
All carrots are fruits

Conclusion: Some Flowers being fruits is a possibility.

Is the above conclusion true or false?

I look forward to hearing from you.

Thanks in advance.

1. Hi, sorry for the delay reply
By cross cancelling 2nd and 3rd you will get Some fruits are not flowers
Don't get confused here this is a tricky one, they have asked Possibility condition.
From above the conclusion it is clear that it must be Some Not right
so in these type of cases if possibility is given in any one of these Some or Not
Say for example "Some Flowers being fruits is a possibility" or "No Flowers being fruits is a possibility" then it is "True"...(Remember only incase of Possibility)
if it is not given it it do not follows
say "Some Flowers are fruits" this is "False"

2. Thanks a ton! It was helpful. You rock!!

17. Plz provide example of vertical cancellation.....great job done by u

18. Thank you....great job
Can u please explain vertical cancellation using this example:-
Statements: A. Some poor are rich
B. All rich are doctors.
C. Some intelligent are doctors.

Conclusions: I. At least some poor are intelligent.
II. All intelligent being rich is a possibility.

1. Hi Praveen,
In first conclusion Poor and Intelligent are taken so first you have to take A and B, by cancelling Rich you will get Some poor are doctors as you see some + some = no conclusion 1st one is false.
In 2nd conclusion Intelligent and doctors are taken if you do vertical cancellation Some + All = Some Intelligent are Rich
by rule in possibility Some A are B => All A are B is a Possibility or All B are A is a Possibility
so 2nd follows

2. Thank u very much ....

3. You are welcome Praveen

4. what if there was no possibility written in 2nd conclusion like "all intelligent being rich" .. then wat wud hv been d answer ???

5. Hi m@dm@x,
then answer will be only
Some + All = Some Intelligent are Rich

6. mam u say no conclusion =any follows but say 1st conclusin is false,how mam please explaiin

7. Hi Rohan,
You have mistaken it...
No conclusion = Any POSSIBILITY is true

NOT any follows please refer again

8. hi mam,

i have the same doubt...
Some poor are rich
All rich are doctors.
I + A = I
so some poor are doctor

some poor are doctor
Some intelligent are doctors.
I + I - No conclusion
so any possibility is true right?
plz clear it mam

1. Hi Venkatesh Kumar

19. Hi can you mention some implications and conversion. Thanks

1. Hi, can you be more precise about the doubt you mentioned.

20. What about only statements?

1. Hi Sarthak,
May I know which "Only statements" you are referring about?

21. all autumn are fasinate
all fasinate are baskets
conclusion:all fasinate being autumn is a possibility
some autunm being basket is a possibility
ans plz......... rply soon

1. This comment has been removed by the author.

2. Hi my doubt is can we conclude based on single statement only?
if yes then conclusion should be some fasinate are not autumn..
m i correct?

3. Some Not is not possible with single statement...

22. Thanks a lot...
Hats off to your efforts...

23. Thanks a lot....
Hats off to your efforts...

1. You are welcome...Jai

24. Sir Can u suggest any book for Syllogism?

25. This method is incorrect. In the case of example 2 ...the one with mails and msgs...answer should be none follow. Because the statement it self says some mails are msgs therefor all mails being msgs is not a possibility.

1. Hi Deepti,
If 'Some Mails are Messages' given in options then you can opt for it. I'm only mentioning about possibility case here in direct

26. This method is wrong. In example 2 ....none follow...since It is stated that some mails are messages...therefor possibility of all mails being msgs cannot exist.

1. Hi Deepti,
Ok lets say your answer is correct that is Some Mails are Messages in Possibility Rules I mentioned Some can be transformed into All as follows
"If Some A are B = All A are being B is a Possibility or All B are being A is a Possibility" now try again

27. Statements:
Maximum copy are pen. Minimum pen are not pencil.
Some pencil are rubber. No rubber is sharpener.
Conclusions:
I. 0.00001% copy can be rubber.
II. Maximum pencil can be pen.

For the 1st cocnlusion we need 1st 3 statemnts to be used..but from 1st 2 only we get NO CONCLUSION..I+O=No conclusion..hence 1st doesnt follow..But answer is 1st follows HOW??? plss explain

1. Hi Subhashree,
I'm so sorry that this is the first time I'm seeing this type of syllogism. I too don't know how to solve this but I will definitely try my level best to find solution for this.
Can you please say from where you found this?

28. Statements: No door is dog. All the dogs are cats.

Conclusions:

No door is cat.
No cat is door.
Some cats are dogs.
All the cats are dogs.

only 3rd option is correct how?

1. Hi Dimendra,
No +All gives Some Not (Reversed) so in those conclusions there is no Some not

Also
All dogs are cats can be taken as
either
Some cats are dogs

or

Some dogs are cats
hence
3rd conclusion follows

29. Statements:
Some gnarl are gnash.
Some gnash are choir.
Conclusions:
I. Some gnarl are choir.
II. Some gnarl being choir is a possibility.
sir isme conclusion possible nhi h na
?
but answer me dia hua hai.. only second follows..
?

1. Hi Ashok,
In this Only 2nd follows here is how

Some + Some = no conclusion

As per rules if there is No conclusion then Any Possibility is True
Here only 2nd conclusion is having Possibility
so it will be the answer.

30. Statements:
All autumn are fascinate.
All fascinate are baskets.
Conclusion:
I. All fascinate being autumn is a possibility.
II. Some autumn being basket is a possibility.
i marked answer both follows but answer is only one follows.
Some televisions are gnash.
No gnash is a mobile.
Conclusions:
I. Some televisions are not mobile.
II. Some mobile are not television.
in this i put both follos,,but answer is only one follows
Statements:
No jostle is a freeze.
No freeze is a scent.
Conclusions:
I. Some jostle not being scent is a possibility.
II. Some jostle being scent is a possibility. i marked none follows but answer is both follows.

1. Hi Ashok,
First one already explained in above comments.
2nd ques
Some + No = Some Not
so
Some televisions are not mobile is correct remember ONLY SOME can be taken in both ways whereas Some Not cannot.

3rd question
No + No = no conclusion
Therefore any Possibility will Follow
So Both follows since both have Possibility in them

2. Hello there, would you please explain the first que again i am little bit confused here.. according to your rules only second conclusion i.e. ''SOME AUTUMN BEING BASKET IS POOSSIBILITY'' Should be correct right ?? but you explained in above asked que that both the conclusion will follow.. how? please explain it thank u.

3. mam please explain the first que again please

4. plz expain the first qstn again.what Akansha said is RIGHT.And the Explanation from above has been removed.So,we are not able to follow it.And you are really doing great job.Thanks alot for your kind work.

31. Statement :
no fruit is vegitable
all potatoes are vegitable
some fruit are apples
conclusions:
1 some apples are potatoes
2 some potatoes being fruits is a possibility

Q2
statement:
no fruit is vegetables
all potatoes are vegetables.
some fruits are apples
conclusion:
1 no fruit is a potato.
2 atleast some apples are fruits

please sir explain again vertical methode with diagram

1. Hi Saurabh,
Q1:
Some apples are fruits + No fruit is vegetable = some apple are not vegetables as some not appears 1st conclusion will not follow

If we take All potatoes are vegetables + No vegetable is fruits = No potato is fruit
Therefore Neither follows.

Q2:
All + No = No potato is fruit => No fruit is potato 1st follows
By converting 3rd we get Some apples are fruits (don't care about Atleast).
So Both Follows.

32. Statement : All A are B.
Conclusion : Some B being A is a possibility.
what is the answer for this... The conclusion follows or not??
please give the explanation too for the answer. Mam plzzzz help me

1. Hi Varun,
Ans is Not Follows

As per conversion rules given in possibilities
if All A are B
then
Some B are Not A is possibility

2. Thank you mam #Respect _/\_

3. You are most welcome Varun

4. hi mam ,
All A are B can be converted into Some B are A
so the conclusion
Some B being A is definitely true ...so conclussion follows right?
or is it like we have to check only possibility rule if conclusion has possibility?

plz help mam

5. Hi,
All A are B can be directly converted into Some A are B (or) Some B are A

33. In Case
Some not + Some not reverse = ?

Like Here,
Some Books are intelligent
No intelligent is wise
some wise are wind.

Conclusion
Some Books are not Wind.

1. Hi,
Anything + Some Not = no conclusion
so
your conclusion is not follows

34. If the conclusion is in “Possibility” case then these rules must be applied.
If All A are B then we can say - Some B are Not A is a Possibility
If Some B are Not A then we can say - All A are B is a Possibility
If Some A are B then we can say - All A are B is a Possibility All B are A is a Possibility
That is
All <=> Some Not Reversed
Some => All
NO Conclusion = Any Possibility is true

As given are these the only rules for possibility cases.............?
If there are any other please share......
And thanks for the help

1. Hi,
Soon there will be an update based on this Syllogisms...
Subscribe to this so that you will get remainder when update is published.

35. hello ... can u explain an example with 5 stmnts pls .....

1. Hi,
sorry for the delay reply...
Almost every syllogism can be concluded by 2 or 3 statements, it doesn't matter how many are given in question. You have to chose among them according to conclusions that's all.

36. No reply:(

1. Hi,
Sorry for not giving reply... busy in preparing an ebook for you guys about Indian Banking and few more rules of Syllogisms...lot of work
Can you please post your comment again.... :-D

37. Mam can u explain syloogism with venn diagram.all possibility cases

1. Hi,
I felt Venn diagram model is tough in case of Possibilities to be frank I too got confused using this model for possibility so I preferred explain it in Rules which is posted here...
I'm really sorry for that but this is really easy method for solving them. If you just spend some time for it in the beginning.

38. Ok thnks but I am not able to understand aeio method for possibility.as in some wuestions its too much confusing.can u provide a seperate notes on possibility by aeio method

1. I'm working on it at present. I will notify you soon after posting the notes.

2. Thnksssss a lottttt mam

39. statement------

all apple is orange
all orange is mango

conclusion---

1) some mango is not apple
2) some mango is not orange
3) some orange is not apple

please reply which option is right or wrong

1. Mam please tel me how the digits are arranged in question 1 st

2. All are wrong

40. Mam, please provide detailed notes for solving "being possibilty" cases. so that students will be more benefited.

41. Statements
1.All men are girls.
2.Some girls are students.
Conclusion
1.All girls are men
2.Some girls are not students.
How to solve this que.???? Coz we can't do cancellation methods

1. All + Some = No conclusion
so both do not follows

we can cancel it through Cross cancellation method (girls)...

42. hi Harshini,
In example 2 you are saying that conclusion 1 is following but in the statements it is written 'all updates are messages' which mean Update is inner circle of messages. if we will follow the conclusion 1 which is all mails being update is a possiblity. Then it will result in mails as inner circle for update. which follows all mails are messages.
I think conclusion 2 is true. Can you please clear my doubt.

43. Hi harshini
I got the ans. please disregard my last message

44. Statement:
All gliders are parachutes.
No parachute is an airplane.
All airplanes are helicopters.

Conclusion:
No helicopter is a glider.
All parachutes being helicopters is a possibility.

Could you please help us on this?

1. From 1 and 2 we get No Glider is Aeroplane + 3rd gives some not
So 1st conclusion is not possible

From 2nd and 3rd we get Some helicopters are not Parachute
By applying rules
we get All parachutes being helicopters is a possibility
2nd Follows

45. thanks DreamJob Adda for ur valuable answer.
Could you please elaborate whats the meaning of 'All parachutes being helicopters is a possibility'

46. Mam could you wxplain some syllogism case where the statement contains some not and how to arrive at conclusion in such cases

47. Hi...
how to solve no+some statements? can you give examples

1. Hi,
Suppose take
No A is B
Some B are C

Now conclusion is
no + some = some not (A is C) this has to be reversed
Therefore you get something like this
some C is not A

2. thanks for your reply:-)
is no+all and no+some ll give the same result? i got confused between these two?

3. These are the rules
No + All = Some Not (Reversed)
No + Some = Some Not (Reversed)

4. Thank you:-)
Reversed means swap the subject and predicate right?

5. Please clarify, I have another doubt.
Statements :
All machines are bad. Some bad are globe.
All globe are round.
Conclusions :I. Some machines are round.
II. No machine is round.

The answer is : either conclusion I or conclusion II is true

How they got this answer. is there any rules for this either type answer?
I couldn't find the answer for this type of problem please help....

6. This is a condition in Either or case
If Statements consists only SOME or other combinations from which answers do not occur
and
in Conclusions where any two conclusions consists of
SOME and NO with same subjects and predicates then it is possible to say EITHER OR here

same happened in the above example you mentioned...

PS Note: Please specify your name I'm not able to get the comments correctly

7. Hi i am Karthikeyan.
Thanks for your fast response:-)
Now i ll try this kind of problem, if i have doubts then i ll ask you.
once again Thank you so much for your response:-)

8. hi this is karthikeyan

Statements: Some pots are keys.
Some keys are locks
All keys are rings.

Conclusions: I. Some pots are locks.
II. Some pots are not locks
III. Some pots are rings
IV. Some pots are not rings

Answer is either I or II and III Follows
please explain
also kindly give the all rules of either or type
still i don't get clear idea about either or type, please help me.

9. Hi karthikeyan,
let me start with 3rd conclusion
for that you have to take 1 and 3 that is
Some + All give Some Pots are Rings hence this is true
Now 1 and 2 conclusion
I already mentioned when there is no answer arise from given statements and conclusions have
SOME and NO (forgot to mention SOME NOT) with same Subjects and Predicates
then Either Or will be the answer
so
I and II will be either or case here

10. so if we have SOME and NO with same subject and predicate,
SOME and SOME NOT with same subject and predicate
and SOME NOT and NO with same subject and predicate, then we can conclude either or. is my observation right?

11. Thank you a lot:-)

12. Statements: Some headphones are earphones
All earphones are telephones.
No telephones are television

Conclusions: I. No earphones are television
II. Some headphones are not television
III. Some headphones are telephones
IV. Some telephones are not television

answer given : all follows
answer which i got is only I and III follows,
which one is right? explain

Note: i dont no whether this message is properly submitted or not:-(

13. Only these two
SOME and NO
SOME and SOME NOT with same subject and predicate

14. You are welcome

15. Thank you:-)
waiting for the answer of question which i sent t u few minutes ago

16. Hi, lets discuss conclusion wise...
1. for this 2nd and 3rd statements have to be taken
All + No gives No earphones are television (It follows)

2. First take 1 and 2 you get "Some headphones are telephones" (this is 3rd Conclusion).
Now
Some headphones are telephones + All earphones are telephones
gives
Some headphones are not television (It follows)

4. I'm so sorry that this rule which I forgot to mention is important here... I'm updating in the above post now. Thanks to you too for reminding it to me.
"No telephones are television" can be converted into
"Some telephones are not television" This is a valid transmission it is True.

17. 2. Shall we use the conclusion which is true to find another conclusion? what is the rule for that.
how Some headphones are telephones + All earphones are telephones
ll give Some headphones are not television. some + all = some right.

4. can we convert No statement into some not with same subject and predicate?

18. I'm really sorry it's my typing mistake I took wrong statement, here is corrected one...
From 1 and 2 we get "Some headphones are telephones"
Now
Some headphones are telephones + No telephones are television gives
Some headphones are not television

I didn't used 3rd conclusion to solve this. I just mentioned that 3rd conclusion has arrived there itself that's all. We can't use conclusions to get answers.

19. Thank you for your reply....
but i cant get u, there is no statement like Some headphones are telephones, then how can we use it?

please explain

20. for 4th conclusion... shall we convert No statement into some not with same subject and predicate?

21. Yes we can, I have specified this in an Update above please refer that in post again

22. "Some headphones are telephones" is a derived statement from given 1 and 2 statements in the question which I further used to get conclusion.

I didn't took it from Conclusions I derived it from question itself that's all...

23. Thank you so much:-)
sorry for late acknowledgement.
now i ll try some problems, if i have doubts then i ll contact you, thankyou

48. Hello......
how to solve statements when the result is like either I or II follows

49. Statement:1.some places are cities
2.some villages are places.
3.some places are cool.
Conclusions:1.some villages being cool is a possibility.
2.some villages are cities.
Mam will u plz explain dis..........

50. Mam plz u explain the case of some+some.......

51. Mam will u plz explain the case of some+some.....

1. Hi Gaurav,
Some + Some leads to No conclusion
you have to check two conditions:
1) if given conclusions are in possibility then it will be the answer,
2) check if the given statements posed as answer (by interchanging)

if these 2 are not satisfied then None follows is the answer

52. Pls explain,

Statements:
All bulbs are chairs
All chairs are tables
All tables are mirrors
conclusion:
All chairs being mirror is posibility

1. If conclusion is 'All chairs are Mirrors' then it will follow
Above conclusion do not follows

53. Pls expain,

1)Statements:
All caps are crowns
Some crowns are masks
All masks are canvas
Conclusion:
No crown being canvas is possibility

2)All fruits are leaves
some leaves are flowers
All flowers are trees
conclusion:
All flowers being leaves is possibility

3)Some inputs are outputs
some outputs are results
conclusion:
All results being output is possibility

4)Some cubes are dice
All dies are plastic
conclusion:
All plastic being dice is possibility

5)All days are weeks
some weeks are months
No month is year
conclusion:
some months not being weeks is possibilty

1. pls, explain d above

54. Statements:
Some Koyal are Parents.
No Parents are Employed.
Some Employed are not Koyal.
Some caps are Koyal.

Conclusion :
(i) Some Employed are definitely not caps
(ii) Some Employed being cap is a possibility
(iii) Some caps are not Parents.
1) Only (i) follow
2) Only (ii) or (iii) follow
3) Only (i) or (ii) follow
4) All follow
5) None of these

Please explain how tosolve this and also if you can give some more ezamples where atatement contains some not that would be very helpful,

55. Statements:
Some Koyal are Parents.
No Parents are Employed.
Some Employed are not Koyal.
Some caps are Koyal.
Conclusion :
(i) Some Employed are definitely not caps
(ii) Some Employed being cap is a possibility
(iii) Some caps are not Parents.
1) Only (i) follow
2) Only (ii) or (iii) follow
3) Only (i) or (ii) follow
4) All follow
5) None of these

Please explain mam how to solve this

56. Mam plz explain cases of some+some

57. no+some=some not[reversed],in this case how possibility is true

58. Statement1.All Ports are airports
2.some airports are harbours.
3.some harbours are docks.
Conclusion1.All docks being airports is a possibility.

59. all A r B

cl : all A r B ?? follow or not?

1. No it do not follows

All A are B => Some A are B or vice versa

2. yo thnx :)

60. Some bob are Luce
All Luce are monk
All monk are loud
Some loud are tachy

Conclusion
1.all tachy not being Luce is possibility
2.some bob not being loud is possibility

61. Questions 1:
Statement:
No physics is geography.
Some zoology are biology.
All physics are zoology.

Conclusions:
I. All geography are zoology is a possibility.
II. All zoology are geography is a possibility.

Questions 2:
Statement:
No cup is a medal.
All medals are trophies.
No trophy is a shield.

Conclusion:
I. Some shields being cups is a possibility.

62. Thanku mam for the valuable post. ..kindly tell wat will happen if "some" and "mostly" remain?

63. st : some A r B

cl : some B being not A is a possibility .

1. St: Some A are B

Cl: All A are B is a Possibility or All B are A is a Possibility

64. some A r B
no B is C .

cl : some A r not C

65. No a is b
All b is c
Cl:no a is c
Right???
Since u said no a is b=no b is a

1. Don't get confused when there is direct way to cancel you need not have to change the pattern.
No + All gives Some not reversed
so Some C is not A

66. All petals are flowers
Some flowers are not petals
Some petals are colors
Cl:some flowers are colors
Some flowers are not colors

67. Thanks alot mam to provide such easy method to solve these problem
I have one doubt pls clarify
In below question where to use no+all and where all+no

No house is a school
All colleges are school
All school are teachers
Conclusion
No house is a teacher
If we use no+all which means somenot in 1 &2 statement
Then if apply somenot +all 2&3 in there should be no conclusion
But answer says this conclusion follows

Pls help me regarding first set of rules u provided

1. Hi,
first let me explain about the conclusion given.
As conclusion deals with House and Teacher you have to take 1st and 3rd statements to get conclusion.
so No + All gives Some Not Reversed you get Some teachers are not houses
so that conclusion does not follows...

2. Hi again,
Now, I have mentioned above about two types of cancellations Cross and Vertical based on these you can apply No + All or whatever based on the given statements and conclusions...
I think I have cleared your doubt if you still got doubt please do comment here...

68. hi....
i have solved many problems by using above trick but couldn't solve the given below problem.
statement:-some A are B.
some B are C.
some C as well as A are D.
conclusion:-
some D are B.
some C are B.
all C being B is a possibilty.
please help me out.

1. Hi Sachin,
Lets start with from the last.
3. Here C and B are given so you can take 1st and 2nd statements
as per rule Some + Some gives None so any possibility is True so it Follows.

2. Just reverse the 2nd statement you will get it.

1. Here D and B are given as far as I remember that As well as is a possibility case.
In 1st conclusion there is no possibility so it do not follows.

69. What is this some not reavsed please explain

70. What is this some not reavsed please explain

1. Hi Saketh,
I have already explained this in above post anyway here it is.
To explain this let’s take a Simple example
No A is B
All B is C

So the conclusion you get for this will be as follows
(No+All) A is C = (Some Not Reversed) A is C
Therefore
Some C are Not A.

the subject and predicate will interchange their places...

71. Hello mam thanks a ton for this wonderful post .Actually i want to ask a prob i often found while solving syllogs. My prob is whenevr we are solving some+some type statement it gives no conclusion acrding to your rules. but some if we have 3 statements and while solving them we have to make use off all those three frst 2 statements with SOME on cancellation gives NO CONLUSION. so how can we use that no conclusion with SOME of third statement ???? hope u understand.. u can see below problem of same type..
All bottles are cups.
Some cups are jugs.
Some jugs are plates.
Conclusions:
I. Some plates are cups.
II. Some plates are bottles.
Ill Some cups are papers.
IV. Some bottles are papers. -
(1) Only III and IV follow
(2) Only I and II follow
(3) Only I and III follow
(4) Only II and IV follow

thank you pls solve this ASAP..

1. Hi Hema, welcome to my blog...
If question consists of 3 statements doesn't mean you have make use of all 3 for every conclusion. You have to consider only those statements which are useful to get conclusions.
Some times answers will be appeared only using 1 or 2 statements also.

Well coming to your example, it is not correct as "Papers" is not given in question.
Also 1st and 2nd conclusions do not follows.

72. Statement: only medicines are tablets
Most tablets are tonic.
Many tablets are bitter.
Conclusion1.Many tonics are medicines.
Many bitter are medicines.
Conclusion1.only tonics being tablets is a possibility.
2.only tonics being bitter is a possinability.
Mam will u plzzzzz explain it quickly, actually my exam is on 20th june, if posssible.....thnkssss in advance!!!!!!!

1. Hi Gaurav,
First convert Only = All and Most, Many = Some
then
For 1st conclusion All medicines are tablets + Some tablets are tonic = no conclusion So it do not follows - similarly for 2nd conclusion...

As per rule Some => All Possibility 3rd conclusion follows
and there is no conclusion for 4th, also Possibility is given so it follows

2. All the Best for your Exam

3. pls solve this..

No day is night.
All nights are noon.
No noon is an evening.
Conclusions:
I. No evenings are nights.
II. All days being noon is a possibility.

ANS: both conclusion I and conclusion II follow.

Some papers are boards.
No board is a card.
Conclusions:
I. No card is a paper.
II. Some papers are cards.

ANS: either conclusion I or conclusion II follows.

No day is night.
All nights are noon.
No noon is an evening.
Conclusions:
I. No day is noon.
II. No day is an evening.

ANS : neither conclusion I nor conclusion II follows.

4. Pls solve this:
No day is night.
All nights are noon.
No noon is an evening.
Conclusions:
I. No evenings are nights.
II. All days being noon is a possibility.

ANS: both conclusion I and conclusion II follow.

Some papers are boards.
No board is a card.
Conclusions:
I. No card is a paper.
II. Some papers are cards.

ANS: either conclusion I or conclusion II follows.

No day is night.
All nights are noon.
No noon is an evening.
Conclusions:
I. No day is noon.
II. No day is an evening.

ANS : neither conclusion I nor conclusion II follows.

5. Hi Vivek, Thanks for commenting...
1. All + No = No nights are evenings => No evenings are nights True
2. No + All = Some day are Not noon => All Day being Noon is a Possibility
(3&4). Some + No = Some papers are not card
but in these cases if conclusions has Some and No with same subject and Predicates then Either or is true
5. No + All does not give No so it is False
6. No + No = No conclusion so False
All the Best.
Vivek please hit Like and Share with your friends about this blog...Thanks

73. No bank is a market.
Some markets are offices.
All restaurants are offices.
Some banks are rooms.

Conclusions:
I. Some markets are not rooms.
II. Some offices are not banks.
III. Some restaurants are markets.
IV. Some rooms are restaurants.

(1) Only I and II follow
(2) Only II follows
(3) Only I, II and III follow
(4) Only I and III follow
(5) None of these
solve this here ans is 2
but for the conlusion 3 we take statement 2 and 3 then there will be no conclusion because of vertical cancellation all+some= no conclusion i want to know that if we take 3 and 2 in order then by vertical cancellation we will get some+all=some
then conclusion 3 would be true? please make it clear.

1. No Akanksha you should not change the order like that...
You should only 1 to 2 or 2 to 3 or 1 to 3 like this not in any other way if you do so you will never find correct answer for any syllogism...
and for your previous doubt I forgot to remove the above explanation for Autumn problem which led you into confusion don't let it bother you...
When is your test anyway?

74. thanks for your reply mam :)
Actualy i forgot to wrote a statement of that question . My exact question was

Statements:
All papers are bottles.
All bottles are cups.
Some cups are jugs.
Some jugs are plates.
Conclusions:
I. Some plates are cups.
II. Some plates are bottles.
Ill Some cups are papers.
IV. Some bottles are papers. -
(1) Only III and IV follow
(2) Only I and II follow
(3) Only I and III follow
(4) Only II and IV follow

1. Hi Hema,
1. Take 3 and 4 statements as they mentioned Plate and Cup
Some + Some = No answer so it do not follows

2. You have to use 2, 3 and 4 for this but
All + Some also does not give any answer so it is also not true.

3. Take 1 and 2 you get All Papers are Cups => Some cups are papers

4. Convert 1st statement All papers are bottles => Some bottles are papers

So Only 3 and 4 follows

75. Statement: All A are B.
Conclusions:
I)All A are B is a possibility.
II)Some A are B is a possibility.

1. Hi Nishant,
All A are B
Conclusion:
Some B are Not A is a Possibility

76. hello mam/sir

my name is niket.
my doubt is how to implement your logic in this qstn as i don't know the venn diagram method.so please explain me with ur logic how to solve this.Here all the 3 names (teacher, professors,lecturer) are used together in conclusion in single statement.

Some teachers are professors.
Some lecturers are teachers.

Conclusions:
I. All teachers as well as professors being
lecturers is a possibility.
II. All those teachers who are lecturers are
also professors.
1) if only conclusion I follows.
2) if only conclusion II follows.
3) if either conclusion I or conclusion II follows.
4) if neither conelusion I nor conclusion II follows.
5) if both conclusions I and II follow.

1. Hi Niket,
Lets see conclusion wise

1. From 1st Some teachers are professors there are possibilities that
All teachers are professors
All professors are teachers
Similarly, from 2nd Some lecturers are teachers there is a possibility that
All teachers are lecturers
So from All professors are teachers + All teachers are lecturers we get
All professors are lecturers.
Therefore All teachers and professors are lecturers is a possibility.
Note: All this is happened because they mentioned about POSSIBILITY here
in 1st conclusion so it follows

2. In 2nd conclusion they didn't gave possibility case so it is not possible to get conclusion that is why it doesn not follow.

Tip: Some + Some => No conclusion which leads any possibility to TRUE

77. hii mam/sir
i am Niket.
what i understood from your explanation is as follows.if i understood wrong let me know.

1. From 1st Some teachers are professors we can conclude following
All teachers being professors is a possiblity.
All professors being teachers is a possibility
Similarly, from 2nd Some lecturers are teachers we can conclude following
All teachers being lecturers is a possibility.
All lecturers being teacher is a possibility.
So from All professors being teachers is a possibility+ All teachers being lecturers being a possibility we get
All professors being lecturers is a possibility.(All+All=ALL)
Therefore All teachers and professors are lecturers is a possibility.

78. is there anyone to answer this?
if conclucion is in possibility, and both the conclusion follows all the rule of either or,
then will it be considered as a 'either or' case or neither 'nor case'?

1. Hi,
Do you have any example for this???

2. Statement:- All A are B

Conclusion:-
A) Some B are A is a possibility.
B) Some B are not A.

Look,
Here both the conclusion are wrong,
both have same subject and predicate,
first one is positive and second one is negative,
and of course its not a case of 'All' and 'No' type.

Reply fast

3. ANY ANS PLZ

4. Hi
I didn't get what you are saying...

79. Statement
All tea are coffee.some coffee are cold drink.all cold drink are thums up.
Conclusion
All coffee are tea
Some cold drink cam be thums up
Atleast some thumsup are cold drink.

Given answer
1.if only conclusion 1 and 2 or 3 follow
2.if only conclsion 1,and 2 follow
3.if only conclusion 1 and 3 follow
4.if only conclusion 2 and 3 follow
5.none of these...

For this the solution is option 5,..but i m getting 4. Pls explain.asap

1. Hi,
1. All tea are coffee cannot be reversed so it is not follows
2. Can be is a possibility case it is also not follows
3. All cool drinks are thumps up => some thumps up are cool drinks so it follows
Only 3 follows which is not given here so None of these is correct